Legal Opinion

Parnell v. Wooten

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1947No. 15883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendants Wooten and Gunnells demurred to the petition on the ground that it affirmatively shows that Gunnells is a resident of Spalding County, and that no substantial affirmative equitable relief is prayed against Wooten and Whitehead, the other two defendants in said cause, and therefore Cobb Superior Court has no jurisdiction over any of the defendants. The court overruled the above ground, along with other grounds of demurrer, and so far as appears in the record there were no exceptions to these rulings. Consequently no question…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Palmer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Arteaga v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Mentone Hotel & Realty Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Calvary Independent Baptist Church v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Brown v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Alford v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API