Legal Opinion

Sowell v. Sowell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1956No. 19266PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

“No persons are parties defendants to a bill in Chancery, except those against whom process is prayed, and who are specially named and described in it as defendants.” Carey v. Hillhouse, 5 Ca. 251, 255. In the present case the grantor (husband of the defendant and former husband of the petitioner) is dead, and his administrator is not made a party defendant in the bill. The trial judge sustained a general demurrer and dismissed the petition. The question is made that the failure to' name the administrator of the deceased as a party defendant is a matter for special demurrer and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Palmer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Taylor v. ColleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Brown v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Ray v. PitmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Water Services, Inc. And Farris Chemical Company v. Tesco Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Emhart Corp. v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Smith v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. Worth v. CIV. SERVICE COM'N OF EL DORADOSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API