Legal Opinion

Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1953No. 18160PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The deed to secure debt from H. L. McKenney to Woodbury Banking Company (the plaintiff in execution) is prior in date and was duly recorded, and would constitute a prior title or lien over the deed to secure debt of the claimant, under the general rules of law. It is contended by the claimant, however, that the decision of this court in McKenney v. Woodbury Banking Co., 208 Ga. 616 (68 S. E. 2d, 571), to the effect that Woodbury Banking Company was not entitled to a “special lien” upon the property described, was a ruling that the plaintiff in execution could not enforce its…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Lovell v. FrankumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Smith v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. McGill v. OsborneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Pardue Medicine Co. Inc. v. PardueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. DeKalb County v. J & a Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Carolina Attractions, Inc. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Country Greens Village One Owner's Ass'n v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. McArthur Electric, Inc. v. Cobb County School DistrictSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API