Legal Opinion

People v. Rajanayagam

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 2012No. G046044PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’LEARY, P. J.

Ajit Bernard Rajanayagam appeals from a judgment after he pled guilty to elder and dependent adult abuse (Pen. Code, § 368, subd. (b)(1))1 (count 1), and aggravated assault (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) (count 2). Rajanayagam argues the trial court erred in failing to award him enhanced presentence conduct credits under the current iteration of section 4019, amended pursuant to the Criminal Justice Realignment Act of 2011 (Realignment Act), and thus he is entitled to additional conduct credits. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

FACTS

On August 20, 2011, Rajanayagam grabbed his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. People v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Adams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re T.P. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API