Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fares

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1993No. D017155PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FROEHLICH, J.

Michael Richard Fares was convicted by a jury of grand theft. (Pen. Code, 1 487, subd. 1.) His probation for two prior convictions was revoked and he was sentenced on all three convictions. Fares’s appeal does not challenge the trial or verdict in any respect. His one contention of error relates to the computation of presentence custody credits made by the trial court at the time of sentencing. He had spent 95 days of actual custody on one of the cases with respect to which probation was revoked. The court gave him credit for these 95 days, but added no section 4019…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. People v. BravoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. In Re JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. LynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. MezaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. Jordan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API