Legal Opinion

City of Montpelier v. Mills

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1908No. 21,099PublishedCited by 8 opinions

•Prom Blackford Circuit Court; Clarence E. Sturgis, Judge. Prosecution by the City of Montpelier against Lee B. Mills. Prom a judgment for defendant, the city appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellee was charged before the mayor of the city of Montpelier with selling intoxicating liquors without a license, in violation of a city ordinance. A trial resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee, from which *176the city appealed to the circuit court, where a retrial was had with the same result.

It is alleged that the circuit, court erred in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the fourth, eighth and ninth paragraphs of answer, and also erred in the conclusions of law stated- upon the special finding of facfe.

The questions raised by appellant’s demurrers to the fourth, eighth and ninth…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Galle v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Zanone v. Mound CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. State v. ScampiniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  5. City of New Orleans v. SmytheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Poulos v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. San Antonio River Authority v. Garrett BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Grimes v. Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Kinney v. Citizens Water & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Beecher v. Peru Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API