Legal Opinion

Moss v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919No. L. A. No. 5328PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for a breach of a written warranty given by the defendants at the time of the purchase by plaintiff from them of an automobile. Plaintiff recovered a judgment of two. thousand dollars. Defendants appeal.

The automobile in question was guaranteed in the following language, to wit: “To be free from defects in material or workmanship for one year from the 13th day of October, 1914, and will replace such defective part or parts in the car absolutely free of charge when delivered at our place of business.”' • ■

It is conceded that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shearer v. Park Nursery Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Burge v. Albany Nurseries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galo Coba v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Square Deal MacHine Co. v. Garrett Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Thomas v. DoorleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Caldwell v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. American Seedless Raisin Co. v. Joshua Hendy Iron WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API