Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Richards

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1928No. Docket No. 6162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The answer admits the execution of the note, but as a special defense alleges that the same was understood and intended between the plaintiffs and the defendants to operate as a contract of indemnity and not otherwise; and that no liability has been incurred by the defendants by virtue thereof. The court found in accordance with said special defense, and adjudged that plaintiffs take nothing by their action and that defendants recover their costs of suit.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment, and in support thereof contend that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sears v. StarbirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Coyle v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Moss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. In Re Estate JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melvin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  2. Replogle v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Melvin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API