Thomas v. Doorley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MONROE, J. pro tem. *
— The plaintiff and respondent brought action for damages, including punitive damages, against the defendants for assault and battery. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded general damages in the amount of $2,000, plus $93 medical expenses and $500 punitive damages. Prom this judgment the defendants appeal. The trial court found, in substance, that on May 21, 1957, at approximately 11 p.m. in the city of Palm Springs, the defendants wilfully and unlawfully committed an assault and battery upon the plaintiff. It was further…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Thom v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Martin v. SheaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Harris v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hood v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Michael R. v. Jeffrey B.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Coffman v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Jaffray v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963