People v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, Acting P. J.
The trial court found attorney and former Alcoholic Beverage Control Investigator Thomas Anderson conspired to violate state liquor laws (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 24079 [transfer of restricted liquor license for consideration in excess of statutory amount]; Pen. Code, § 182, subds. (a)(1), (5)). Anderson argues Orange County was an improper venue, section 24079 is not a criminal statute, and insufficient evidence supports his convictions. We affirm.
I
Dennis Minnock and his wife were sole shareholders in a corporation that operated a Laguna Beach restaurant and obtained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- H. A. S. Loan Service, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Say & Say, Inc. v. EbershoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993