Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1991No. G010486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, Acting P. J.

The trial court found attorney and former Alcoholic Beverage Control Investigator Thomas Anderson conspired to violate state liquor laws (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 24079 [transfer of restricted liquor license for consideration in excess of statutory amount]; Pen. Code, § 182, subds. (a)(1), (5)). Anderson argues Orange County was an improper venue, section 24079 is not a criminal statute, and insufficient evidence supports his convictions. We affirm.

I

Dennis Minnock and his wife were sole shareholders in a corporation that operated a Laguna Beach restaurant and obtained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. H. A. S. Loan Service, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Say & Say, Inc. v. EbershoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API