Legal Opinion
Building Permit Consultants, Inc. v. Mazur
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 2004No. B170797PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1404Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The appellant, Building Permit Consultants, Inc. (BPC), appeals from a judgment entered after the defendants’ several demurrers to the first amended complaint (hereafter, FAC) were all sustained without leave to amend. Among other things, the trial court concluded that BPC’s multiple claims allegedly arose from, and were based upon, a voidable contract to provide public insurance adjuster services that were regulated and licensed by the Department of Insurance pursuant to Insurance Code sections 15006, 15007 and 15008.1 Since BPC did not (and, in fact, could not) allege that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Tarmann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Robinson v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Holland v. MORSE DIESEL INTERNAT., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Prostar Wireless Grp., LLC v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Fleet v. Bank of America CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- BRITZ FERTILIZERS, INC. v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Westamerica Bank v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.