Legal Opinion

Meier v. City of Columbia Heights

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 2004No. A04-58PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Respondent filed a complaint alleging illegal seizure, violation of procedural due process, violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and vandalism against' appellant, City of Columbia Heights, and numerous individuals. Appellant and the individually-named defendants moved for summary judgment based on qualified and official immunity. The district court found the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from respondent’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, as well as official immunity in relation to respondent’s state-law claims. But the district court denied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. Asian Women United of Minnesota v. LeiendeckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. City of Minneapolis v. Ames & Fischer Co. II, LLPCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Kie Vang, and v. Joshua Paul Forsman, Ely Chamber of Commerce, City of Ely, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API