Meier v. City of Columbia Heights
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Respondent filed a complaint alleging illegal seizure, violation of procedural due process, violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and vandalism against' appellant, City of Columbia Heights, and numerous individuals. Appellant and the individually-named defendants moved for summary judgment based on qualified and official immunity. The district court found the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from respondent’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, as well as official immunity in relation to respondent’s state-law claims. But the district court denied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Asian Women United of Minnesota v. LeiendeckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- City of Minneapolis v. Ames & Fischer Co. II, LLPCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Kie Vang, and v. Joshua Paul Forsman, Ely Chamber of Commerce, City of Ely, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.