Legal Opinion

City of Minneapolis v. Ames & Fischer Co. II, LLP

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 2006No. A05-2316PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment by appellant city and agency to dismiss respondent’s tort claims and counterclaims based on statutory and vicarious official immunity. Appellants sued respondent Ames & Fischer Co. II, LLP for breach of contract for its failure to make certain payments arising out of a parking ramp construction project, and respondent counterclaimed and sued alleging misrepresentation and related claims regarding projected cash flow from the parking ramp. Appellants argue their decisions and conduct, set forth in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geronimo DeLuna v. Mower CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Pigs R US, LLC v. Compton TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Franklin C. Olson v. Rustic Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API