Legal Opinion

McNabb v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 3, 1951No. 10761_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Circuit Judge.

O. E. Thomas, one of the appellees, came to Washington in June 1948 to seek a buyer for a Tennessee peach orchard. Through the medium of the Senate Realty Company, he was put in touch with appellant John D. McNabb, who had listed his Washington real estate with the realty company for sale or exchange. After a series of negotiations, including a trip to Tennessee by McNabb to examine the orchard, Thomas and McNabb, on July 12, 1948, entered into an agreement providing that Thomas would convey the orchard to McNabb in return for McNabb’s equity in the District of Columbia…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Farnsworth v. DuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. David F. Brown, Tore T. Debella, Richard A. Reizen, Robert F. EhrlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  4. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  5. United States Ex Rel. Roman v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API