Legal Opinion
United States v. Goldberg
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1958No. Civ. A. 12544PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This action was commenced by the United States under 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231 and 233, commonly known as the False Claims Act. Pursuant to a request by the Government and a stipulation entered into by the parties, an Amended Complaint was filed setting forth an additional Count, which, in substance, alleged payment by the Government of rents in excess of the maximum annual rate of 15% of the fair market value of the demised premises. 40 U.S.C.A. § 278a.
Events leading to this controversy began in the spring of 1945, when representatives of the War Assets Administration…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gordon v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Cooperative Grain and Supply Co., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- McCarthy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- United States v. Fox Lake State BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- United States v. Hangar One, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.