People v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Adams, 85 AD3d 1192 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 857 [2011]; People v Guillen, 85 AD3d 1201 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Lopez, 85 AD3d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People of State of New York v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GuillenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AcostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CzarneckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.