Carlson v. Williams
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
We find, on examination of the respective briefs, that plaintiffs have fairly and concisely stated the facts necessary to comprehensive understanding of that which is before us. Their statement follows:
“Plaintiffs and appellees, the Carlsons, alleged in their bill that in the year 1927 they became the owners in fee of 2 pieces of property described as lots 278 and 280, Silver Springs Lake Estates. They
■ acquired lot 280 from the platter, Margaret S. Cur-tiss, and lot 278 the same year from one Rex W. Beardsley, who acquired the same from Margaret S. Curtiss, the platter.
“The bill alleges that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berg v. BergMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Herpolsheimer v. A. B. Herpolsheimer Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- McCoy v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Raniak v. PokorneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Dequindre Development Co. v. Charter Township of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Miller v. Magline, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hack v. Concrete Wall CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.