Legal Opinion

Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1962No. Docket 72, Calendar 49,688PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

February 9,1961 plaintiff duly applied,, to the defendant city, for a permit authorizing construction of a “drive-in” restaurant on its recently purchased parcel of Detroit property. The parcel was then zoned B2, permitting such construction and' use. Some 3 weeks later the city notified plaintiff that the latter’s plans, submitted with the application, required certain corrections. The corrections were made. A week or so later the city’s building-department advised plaintiff that no permit would be issued; that a petition to rezone such parcel had just been filed per ordinance authorizing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Willingham v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Carlson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Carlson v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Palmer-Stevenson Construction Co. v. Mason Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. King v. Director of the Midland County Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Bevan v. Brandon TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Board of Education v. Superintendent of Public InstructionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wolverine Golf Club v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API