Brown v. Starbucks Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SANDRA BROWN, Case No.: 18cv2286 JM (WVG) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S 11 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 12 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, COMPLAINT 13 Defendant. 14 15 Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”) moves to dismiss and/or strike 16 Plaintiff Sandra Brown’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6), 17 12(b)(2), and 12(f). (Doc. No. 16.) Plaintiff Sandra Brown opposes. (Doc. No. 17.) The 18 court found this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. (Doc.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.