Legal Opinion
Carlay Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 15, 1946No. 8735PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Petitioners seek a review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission directing them to desist from disseminating advertisements which represent (a) that excessive weight may be removed from the human body through the use of petitioners’ product and weight reducing plan without restricting the diet and (b) that the removal of excess weight through the use of the product and plan is “easy.” The order further directs that any advertisements shall disclose that the product and plan include adherence to “a restricted diet” and that such adherence is essential to weight…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Bartlett v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Rachlin v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Abel Allan Goodman, an Individual Trading as Weavers Guild v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. TrudeauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Bowen Transports, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1953
- Presidio Enterprises, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.