Legal Opinion
Rachlin v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 2, 1938No. 220PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
In January, 1934, Mrs. Rachlin, the plaintiff, purchased a new Buick automobile from a Buick dealer in New Jersey. She paid the dealer $10 more than the regular price in order to have the windshield and deflectors equipped with “safety glass” manufactured by the defendant, insisting upon this because she had read advertisements which the defendant had caused to be published in a weekly magazine. In December, 1934, while Mrs. Rachlin’s Buick was proceeding along a public highway in Virginia, it was run into by a car that was speeding in the opposite direction and out of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Chanin v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Williams v. Detroit Oil & Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Salvatore J. Sylvestri v. The Warner & Swasey Co., Inc., Salvatore J. Sylvestri v. Comad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.