Legal Opinion

Barron v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1931No. 14278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is seduction; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

There being no sentence in the record, we are not authorized to consider the appeal on its merits. A final judgment is necessary to confer jurisdiction upon this court. Butler v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 8 S. W. (2d) 183.

The term of court at which appellant was convicted, as shown by the caption, ended on the 27th day of November, 1930. We find in the record a purported recognizance in which it is shown that appellant and his sureties appeared in open court on November 28, 1930, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. State v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Ice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Actkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Wallace Gillispie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API