Actkinson v. State

ON SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant so urgently insists in his application for leave to file second motion for rehearing that we erred in holding the evidence sufficient to corroborate prosecutrix on the point that appellant obtained carnal knowledge of her upon her reliance on his promise to marry her> — that we have again gone over the record with this in mind, and have withdrawn our opinion on rehearing, and substitute the following.

Prosecutrix swore that about March 1, 1934, he told her that he loved her, and asked her to marry him, and she promised she would do…