Legal Opinion

Ice v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1919No. 4857PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

The conviction is for seduction. The fact that prosecutrix submitted to intercourse with the appellant upon his promise of marriage was definitely testified to hy her and supported hy other evidence constituting sufficient corroboration. There was proof that she gave birth to a child; that appellant when charged with her seduction, after first denying it, stated in substance, when told that prosecutrix’s mother was going to press prosecution, that if he was given a few days he would marry the girl, that he first wanted to procure a place to take her, and obtaining consent, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. State v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Walls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Stovall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Barron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Owen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API