Legal Opinion

Prowant, Administratrix v. Kings-X

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1959No. 41,114PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion

OPINION OF REVERSAL ON REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

A rehearing was granted in this case, and it has been reargued. The majority of the court is now of the opinion that the manifest error of the original obiter dictum found first in the case of McCarthy, Adm’r, v. Railroad Co., 18 Kan. 46, need not be further adhered to by this court. The history of the error in the McCarthy case is quite adequately set forth in the dissenting opinion beginning in 184 Kan., at page 416 of the first report of this case. This dissenting opinion is hereby incorporated by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McCarthy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. City of Eureka v. MerrifieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Cain v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Robinson v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Flowers, Administratrix v. Marshall, AdministratorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. In Re Estate of PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API