Legal Opinion

Flowers, Administratrix v. Marshall, Administrator

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1972No. 46,451PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an interlocutory appeal in a survival action brought on behalf of the estate of plaintiff’s deceased who died from injuries caused by the negligence of defendant’s deceased.

In a pretrial order the trial court ruled that future lost earnings could not be recovered as an element of damages, holding that damages for such item could only be recovered up to the time of death.

The trial court found that the ruling involved a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Goodyear v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Hulbert v. City of TopekaUnited States Circuit Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Claflin v. WalshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Farm & City Insurance v. American Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Mason v. Gerin Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Jeanes v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API