Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Eicher

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 13, 1944No. Misc. 71PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to reinstate counsel in a trial. James J. Laughlin, the petitioner, is a member of the bar. Edward C. Eicher, the respondent, is Chief Justice of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia and is presiding in United States v. McWilliams et al., D.C., 54 F.Supp. 791, commonly called the sedition trial.

Until July 5, 1944, petitioner represented two of the defendants in that trial. On that day, respondent called upon the attorneys who were concerned in the matter to “explain or justify or make such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  2. United States v. McWilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944
  3. State v. CrumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sere v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Bank of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. KAVANAUGHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API