Legal Opinion

State v. KAVANAUGH

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 29, 1968PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order revoking permission theretofore extended under R. R. 1:12-8 to F. Lee Bailey, a member of the Massachusetts bar, to appear pro hac vice for defendants Harold Matzner and Dorothe Krueger in the first captioned matter and for defendant Harold Matzner in the second captioned matter. After the trial court entered the order, the defendants instituted a proceeding in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey directly against the trial judge to restrain him from enforcing that order. The Federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Cooper v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  5. State v. Van DuyneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re HindsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. In Re RachmielSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API