Legal Opinion

Finley v. Estate of DeGrazio

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 2, 2007No. 94,698PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

After a district court judge granted a 30-day extension to obtain service of process on defendants, plaintiff Kelly A. Finley timely effected service. A subsequent district court judge ruled that Finley had not shown the requisite good cause for the extension under K.S.A. 60-203(a) and set aside the order. As a result, her action was not timely commenced and was dismissed.

The Court of Appeals applied the unique circumstances doctrine to save Finley s service of process and her lawsuit. Finley v. Estate of DeGrazio, 36 Kan. App. 2d 844, 148…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Gerhardt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Schroeder v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. LE v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  4. In re Estate of OrokeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Mangus v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API