Finley v. Estate of DeGrazio
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nuss, J.:
After a district court judge granted a 30-day extension to obtain service of process on defendants, plaintiff Kelly A. Finley timely effected service. A subsequent district court judge ruled that Finley had not shown the requisite good cause for the extension under K.S.A. 60-203(a) and set aside the order. As a result, her action was not timely commenced and was dismissed.
The Court of Appeals applied the unique circumstances doctrine to save Finley s service of process and her lawsuit. Finley v. Estate of DeGrazio, 36 Kan. App. 2d 844, 148…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Gerhardt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Schroeder v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- LE v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- In re Estate of OrokeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Mangus v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.