Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Oroke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 2, 2019No. 116333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by Malone, J.:

*745 A testator deposited his original will and a codicil with the probate court of his home county as permitted by statute. The statute mandated the district court to retain the will during the lifetime of the testator and to open the will publicly and retain the same upon being notified of the testator's death. K.S.A. 59-620 (Furse 1994).

A few weeks after the testator's death, heirs tried to locate the will at the courthouse. The clerk of the court was unable to find it and informed the heirs that the will *746 was not in the custody of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Johnson v. Westhoff Sand Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monarch Build v. DLH HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  2. Doan Family Corp. v. ArnbergerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. OathoutCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API