Legal Opinion

Mangus v. Stump

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 3, 2011No. 105,040PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J:

This is an interlocutory appeal filed by Harl G. Stump, M.D., and Victor M. Eddy, M.D., challenging the district court’s decision to apply the unique circumstances doctrine to prevent a cause of action filed by Danny Mangus from being barred by the statute of limitations. Although we recognize that the unique circumstances doctrine is one of specific and limited application, we affirm the district court’s utilization of the doctrine under the facts of this case.

On May 29, 2008, Mangus filed a petition against Stump and Eddy (defendants) alleging medical negligence. The petition…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of OrokeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. In re Partnership of PB&RCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  3. Soto-Montes (ID 89404) v. Corizon, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API