Legal Opinion

People v. Odegard

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1962No. Crim. 7710PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.

On December 16, 1960, an information was filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County charging defendant Gary L. Odegard and Truman R. Nyland with a violation of Penal Code section 211, robbery. After a jury trial they were found guilty and were sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed by law. Odegard appeals from the judgment and “from the denial of the motion of said defendant for a new trial.” There is no evidence in the record of a motion for a new trial, and we will assume that this case is on appeal from the judgment.

The facts, viewed favorably to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. NebbittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Ray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. People v. MylesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. MontagueWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Virgil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API