Legal Opinion

People v. McKinney

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1935No. Crim. 2766PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

Accused by information, tried by a jury and found guilty of having in his possession what is commonly known as a “sap” or blackjack, defendant appeals to this court upon the sole ground that there was not sufficient evidence introduced at his trial to sustain the verdict of the jury. Mere possession of a blackjack or similar instrument is denounced as a felony by the Deadly Weapons Act (sec. 1, Act 1970, Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, p. 900).

The instrument in this case was found, not on the person of defendant, but in a suitcase under the bed in a room occupied jointly by him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. SatchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. WissenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. PhinisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API