Legal Opinion
Virgil v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1968No. Civ. 12026PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Petitioners Virgil, Hinegardner and Leggett were charged in two counts for violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530—cultivating marijuana (count 1) —and possession of marijuana (count 2). In the trial court they moved to set aside the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995 and to suppress certain evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5. Both motions were denied. We issued an alternative writ of prohibition and a temporary stay of proceedings.
The sole evidence upon which petitioners were held to answer and upon which both counts of the information rest is certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State v. BosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Duncan and Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.