Legal Opinion

United States v. Tchibassa

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 1, 2011No. Criminal No. 1991-0560Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Crim. No. 91-cr-560-3 (TFH) vs. ARTUR TCHIBASSA, Defendant. \/\/\/\/§/\_/§/\./\./\y Memorandum Opinion Pending before the Court are (i) Mr. Tchibassa’s FRCP 60(b) Motion for Relief (the "R_ul_e__6_0_ 10 from the Court’s August 2l, 2009 judgment denying his motion under

18 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (the "Habeas Motion") as expounded by a supplemental habeas brief filed on his behalf under the Inmate Legal Assistance Proj ect (the "Supplemental Habeas l"); (ii) the Govemment’s Motion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of MayorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API