Legal Opinion

Seip Et Ux. v. Laubach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1938No. Appeal, 101PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Mr. Justice Drew,

On May 29, 1929, Howard H. Laubacb, the defendant, borrowed $8,000 from Thomas H. Seip and Jennie S. Seip, the plaintiffs, and gave his judgment note for that amount. In 1932 judgment was entered on the note and an attachment execution was issued on March 30, 1936, against the Cement National Bank and against Howard H. Laubach individually and as executor of his father’s estate. At the time this attachment issued defendant was indebted to the bank in the sum of $33,227 ($25,875 as maker and $7,352 as endorser of various notes). Originally the bank held as security…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bouslough v. BousloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. Adkins v. PothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Butler County National Bank v. MacMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. J. H. & C. K. Eagle, Inc. v. KunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Schimmel v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ultramar Energy Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Horbal v. Moxham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Overbrook Heights Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Mills v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Premium Financing Specialists, Inc. v. Remcor, Inc. (In Re Remcor, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API