Legal Opinion

J. H. & C. K. Eagle, Inc. v. Kunkle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1923No. Appeal, No. 320PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephaet,

Appellee owned a building which appellant’s vendor wished to have remodeled into a manufacturing plant. This would require extensive repairs which appellee was unwilling to undertake, unless the cost of the improvement was guaranteed to him in some way. No lease *192had been executed between the parties, and, to indemnify appellee, appellant’s vendor, Bosetti, turned over, as security, the machinery and property to be placed in the building for the cost of remodeling it. The pledge was to continue pending the actual execution of the lease and occupancy of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StranghellanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. Collins's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Citizens' Bank v. Dows & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Srodes v. CavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  5. Sausser v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seip Et Ux. v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. J. R. Watkins Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Murdock v. MurdockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Layman v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Nissley v. Heller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API