First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. Banberry Crossing
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs initiated this action against defendants, claiming that defendants defaulted on various financial obligations owed to plaintiffs arising from a real estate development in Park City, Utah. Plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, a money judgment, foreclosure of its trust deeds, appointment of a receiver, and general equitable relief. Defendants Banberry Crossing and Banberry Development Corporation (“Banberry”) filed what has been denominated a cross-claim against Eugene L. Kimball, Keith Garner, and the Salt Lake City law firm of Snow, Christensen & Mar-tineau…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Blodgett v. MartschUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Management Committee of Graystone Pines Homeowners Ass'n Ex Rel. Owners of the Condominiums v. Graystone Pines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Jack B. Parson Companies v. NieldUtah Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Burnett v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Neff v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Dillon v. Southern Management Corp. Retirement TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.