Legal Opinion

First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. Banberry Crossing

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1989No. 20266PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated this action against defendants, claiming that defendants defaulted on various financial obligations owed to plaintiffs arising from a real estate development in Park City, Utah. Plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, a money judgment, foreclosure of its trust deeds, appointment of a receiver, and general equitable relief. Defendants Banberry Crossing and Banberry Development Corporation (“Banberry”) filed what has been denominated a cross-claim against Eugene L. Kimball, Keith Garner, and the Salt Lake City law firm of Snow, Christensen & Mar-tineau…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Blodgett v. MartschUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Management Committee of Graystone Pines Homeowners Ass'n Ex Rel. Owners of the Condominiums v. Graystone Pines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Jack B. Parson Companies v. NieldUtah Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Burnett v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Neff v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Dillon v. Southern Management Corp. Retirement TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API