Legal Opinion

Jack B. Parson Companies v. Nield

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1988No. 19910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Defendants Mr. & Mrs. Layle H. Nield (Nield) appeal from the trial judge’s ruling granting Jack B. Parson Companies (Parson) title and damages in a quiet title action. Nield argues that damages were inappropriate and that the trial court misconstrued the real estate contract. Nield also appeals from the assessment of $1.00 in nominal damages against third-party defendant Biesinger.

Parson sold a parcel of commercial real estate to Utah Northern Development Corporation (UND), using a standard form uniform real estate sales contract. The parcel was subject to a trust deed in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lockhart Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wiscombe v. Lockhart Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kobza v. TrippCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. Banberry CrossingUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bass v. Planned Management Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Association v. Bagley & Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API