Legal Opinion

Howarth v. Ostergaard

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1973No. 13293PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiffs Howarth purchased a home from the defendants Ostergaard, in Linden. They allege that the defendants wrongfully recorded a mortgage on the property, which prevented the plaintiffs from obtaining a bank loan, and that they thus lost profits anticipated from financing a Christmas tree business. Upon a trial to the court, it made the findings and judgment against the plaintiffs and they appeal.

The Howarths bought the home under a uniform real estate contract in May of 1962. The price was $20,500, $1,500 down, the balance to be paid at $150 per month. The contract…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. West Investment Co. v. MoorheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Gould v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dowse v. Doris Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. J.B.J. Feedyards, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Marvin Mueller v. James Abdnor, Administrator, Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. Banberry CrossingUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dillon v. Southern Management Corp. Retirement TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Acculog, Inc. v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API