Legal Opinion

Vanoski v. Thomson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1988No. 16501PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court’s prior opinion, dated February 3, 1988, is hereby withdrawn.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court holding a debtor liable on a promissory note. We are presented with two questions: whether the district court erred in admitting parol evidence of the intent of the parties to a transaction releasing a security for the debt; and whether the obligees on the note were estopped from seeking to collect the debt by virtue of having signed documents purporting not only to release the underlying security but also to discharge the debt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Gardner v. FliegelIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. KTVB, INC. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mohr v. ShultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Berryman v. DoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. TIE Communications, Inc. v. KoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. City of Kellogg v. Mission Mountain Interests Ltd., Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. McCandless v. CarpenterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hall v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hall v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API