Scahill v. Miniter
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The only exceptions presently before this court are those of the defendant Miniter to the order permitting amendment of the motions of the other defendants to set aside the verdicts, and to the denial of Miniter’s motion for judgment in his favor. By this transfer Miniter seeks to establish that the other defendants have no interest in the verdict in his favor, and no standing to question it.
In our opinion the exception to the denial of Miniter’s motion for judgment on the verdict should be sustained. He relies upon Beaule v. Weeks, 95 N. H. 453, which in our judgment is controlling. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fabrizi v. GolubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Plante v. Canadian National RailwaysSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hagenbuch v. Snap-On Tools Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1972
- Morrissette v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. F. A. Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- William H. Field Co. v. Nuroco Woodwork, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Consolidated Utility Equipment Services, Inc. v. Emhart Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.