Legal Opinion
Hagenbuch v. Snap-On Tools Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 2, 1972No. 1:11-adr-00009PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOWNES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard P. Hagenbuch brings this action for damages for personal injuries resulting from a hammer chip striking him in the left eye. He alleges breach of implied and express warranties, negligence, and strict liability in tort. His wife, Joan Hagenbuch, seeks damages for loss of consortium. Defendant Snap-On Tools Corporation was the seller of the hammer, and defendant Houdaille Industries, Inc. through its subsidiary, Fairmount, was the manufacturer of the hammer which the plaintiff was using at the time of the injury. Jurisdiction is based on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Speed Fastners, Inc. v. NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Stephan v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Beverly Cole Anita S. Perkins Jewell P. Lowe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Compaq Computer Corp. v. LaprayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.