Legal Opinion

W. T. Grant Co. v. United Retail Employees, Local No. 134

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1943No. Appeal, 68PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

This appeal involves a remedial provision of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act of June 1, 1937, P. L. 1168, §8 (c), as amended by Act of June 9, 1939, P. L. 293 (43 PS 211.8 (c)), whereby the Labor Relations Board is authorized in case of unfair labor practice on the part of an employer affecting an employee to order the employee’s reinstatement, “with or without back pay, as will effectuate the policies of this act”. The board originally ordered the reinstatement of Edna Pupack by W. T. Grant Co., Inc., her employer, and awarded her back pay between the dates…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. United Retail Employees of America, Local No. 134 v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Sand's Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Plumstead Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Del Buono v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Crivelli Bros. Coal & Builders Supplies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API