Legal Opinion

Hay v. Norwalk Lodge, B.P.O.E.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1951No. 621PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the second amended petition, on the ground, that it fails to state a cause of action. Plaintiff not desiring to further plead, the action was dismissed.

Plaintiff, as administratrix, brought her action against the Norwalk Lodge of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, five individuals as trustees of the lodge, and one Harry E. Sanders. It is alleged that the five individual defendants are the trustees of a nonincorporated organization known as Norwalk Lodge No. 730, Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Herron v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. Fremont Lodge of Loyal Order of MooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Koogler v. KooglerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hofius v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Heckert v. PatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hensley v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Taylor v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API