State v. Fremont Lodge of Loyal Order of Moose
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The decision in this case rests upon-whether under the criminal laws of this state appellant may be treated as an entity.
If appellant is an entity then its appearance was-entered by its motion to quash in which not only the-jurisdiction of the court over the person was challenged but the merits of the case were also challenged. It is elementary that where one comes into court for- the purpose of objecting to jurisdiction of his person the motion or pleading must be strictly limited to the ■question of jurisdiction.
Attention is called to the first paragraph of the syllabus in the cases…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Koogler v. KooglerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by31 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KrutzOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Hay v. Norwalk Lodge, B.P.O.E.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
- City of St. Paul v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.