Heckert v. Patrick
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
Two issues are presented for review by this appeal with the initial query being one of first impression. We must initially determine the duty of care owed to the traveling public by a property owner whose land abuts a highway and contains growing trees with limbs overhanging the traveled portion of the roadway. The second question is whether a statutory or common-law duty exists in a board of county commissioners to remove a tree or its limbs which overhang a county road.
I
Generally, one may use his land as he sees fit, providing that his use does not invade the rights of others. In assessing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Albin v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Zents v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Hay v. Norwalk Lodge, B.P.O.E.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Hensley v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Pelletier v. Campbell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Harp v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Ray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Harp v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.