Legal Opinion

Schollman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1936No. 29449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Raper, District Judge.

This action was begun October 7, 1933, by plaintiff, Fred J. Schollman, to recover total disability benefits and return *664of two premium payments on a life insurance policy issued to him by the defendant, Prudential Insurance Company. The policy for $5,000 was issued May 16, 1923, and contained the following clauses:

“Disability Before Age 60 — Waiver of Premiums. If the insured shall furnish due proof to the company that, while this policy was in full force and effect, he (or She), at any time after payment of the first premium on the policy, while less than sixty years…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hablutzel v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McAndrews v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Floyd M. Andrews, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. New Masonic Temple Ass'n v. Globe Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. O'Neil v. Union National Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API