Legal Opinion
Floyd M. Andrews, Inc. v. Aetna Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1936No. 31,063PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
From a judgment on the pleadings in favor of appellants for $100 they appeal. The suit is to recover disability benefits under an insurance policy issued by defendant. The administratrix of the estate of the-insured intervened. By stipulation the rights as between plaintiff and intervener were not to be determined in this suit. The pleadings allege and admit these facts: The corporate existence of plaintiff and defendant and the status of intervener as administratrix of the estate of the insured. November 26, 1924, defendant issued its policy insuring the life of Floyd M.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Smith v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robbert v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Mutual Life Ins. v. DrummondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Wold v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Binder v. General American Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.