Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 8, 1976No. Civ. A76-85PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss affirmative defenses. Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(f) & 12(h)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was originally filed in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska. It was removed to this court based on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1441. 1

The factual basis for the claim is that the defendant allegedly discriminated against the plaintiff on the basis of age when plaintiff was terminated from his employment after reaching age 65. Plaintiff relies on Alaska Statute Sec.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. CottrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
  3. Dunlop v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Webster v. Bechtel, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API